Philosophy Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Philosophy - Assignment ExampleTaking into account leaders like peter who unaccompanied believed that ones somebody makes a mistake he should be given just some partial punishment to mitigate the action and let him go. Besides, the use of force, bureau and guns to offenders not only derail integrity, but also kill their personal aspirations. A person may not have full potential to a society, but the superficial contribution brought by such people should be trusted and their capacity for great achievements should be put into recognition. Good leaders should demonstrate merriment to their subjects. This is because happiness indicates a persons free will to drive away all forms of evil as it encourages people to seek ideas and consolidate support and give together to a specific vision of the society. Despite such recognitions, people should be taught to accept the practice of good morals in the society. Unethical acts should be exposed to the people as deprival and sinful. This wil l drive in ideas of what is termed as sinful and could lead to disgraceful society. Besides, the ambitions of good morals should be cultivated at the fore front as this will make people develop a common good to the society (Lieberman, Richter and Rank). Societal leadership should embrace the principle of religion to the members of the society. ... Each one should be allowed to develop his personal ambitions without engaging in the thoughts of his neighbor. This would facilitate unified agreements amongst the neighbors and embrace projectable effort to satisfy the desire for separately other if everybody is given time to develop independent perception. From the narrator it articulated that, authoritative use of force not only kills peoples power of aspiration but it also instill fear and derail progressive prosperity of the society (Lieberman, Richter and Rank). The soul of an individualist After having been victimized for dynamiting the government lodgement project, Roaks develop ed a speech which was meant to illustrate how every success has to come at an expense of something. Giving an illustration from the past, we mustiness concede that man must be submissive at any new introductory aspect in life. Taking into account several inventions man has ever made, it is true to derive that, success comes at an expense of some effort and this would only be beneficial to the other members of the society. Regardless of all suffering, torture and bestowed to a person because of his effort, the conceit for succeed is a vision for all and anybody who has endured suffering must be made aware that, success must start with a single gradation (Lieberman, Richter and Rank). The mind of a person is considered as an attribute for himself. Through Roaks speech we are able to understand that, an individual mindset is atoll to his success and this is something that cannot be shared. Moreover each and every person must be able to think alone however, a collective decision is acceptable even though the primary sauce of the goal is supposed to be independent from a