Whew!

Whew! Hi Everyone! Its been quite a while since I last blogged. MIT can be a harsh mistress. But Id like to use this post to get back into the swing of things and begin posting regularly again. When we last left each other, Id finished the hardest semester of my undergraduate career. I received my first D, but I fulfilled enough graduation requirements for both degrees and got a whole lot of planning experience being the operations officer for NROTC. IAP 08 came and went without a post, and that was intentional. I took 10.493: Integrated Chemical Engineering Topics over IAP. After my abysmal performance in ICE back in the fall, I decided to put my all into that module. I did, and I think it paid off. For some reason my grade hasnt posted to WebSIS yet, but Im pretty sure its an A. I cant remember the last time I got one of those. Probably back when I was a freshman. This semester is my last hurrah. While my total number of units dropped, the actual difficulty of the courses increased. Lets take a look at my registration this semester: 8.04: Quantum Physics I I finally feel like a physicist. Up until this point, Ive felt like a kid walking around in his daddys shoes pretending to be a grown up. Now I feel like Im beginning to build a fundamental understanding of the way the universe works. This is a great class, and Id highly recommend it to anyone with an interest in physics, even if you dont plan on majoring in course 8. At the very least, it will make you question how the world around you works. In fact, Im still struggling with some of the results of what Ive been told. Of late, Ive been wondering about the following: Quantum mechanics says you cannot predict, in a deterministic fashion, the location of a particle at a given time. However, you can predict the probability with which a particle will be found over a set of locations. Once you measure a particles position, its probability distribution turns into a spike (because youve found it, the probability that the particle is anywhere else becomes zero. This property is called wavefunction collapse, and to the best of my knowledge its true nature is still a mystery). A small amount of time later, you know that it must be somewhere near where you just found it. However, the same cannot be said for an equally small amount of time before! You can say nothing about the location of the particle before you actually measured it, regardless of where you find it. Ok, thats all fine, I guess. In the face of experiment and mathematics I can swallow my disbelief. What I dont get is this: Quantum Mechanics is a deeper theory of reality than classical mechanics, yet in the limit of large quantum numbers (things with everyday size have large quantum numbers), quantum mechanics reproduces classical mechanics (a result called the correspondence principle). However, we know that classical mechanics looks the same regardless of the direction of time. That is, if I know the position and momentum of a classical particle, I know where it is and how fast its moving immediately after AND immediately before. How does a theory that says we cant say anything about where a particle is before we measure it give rise to a very well-understood theory that is invariant under a reversal in time? Im sure theres an answer, they just havent taught me enough yet. By the way, the lecturer this term is Marin Soljacic. After being bothered by a beeping cell phone, he decided to invent wireless electricity (I guess we should credit Tesla too). I should decide to invent something. 8.044: Statistical Physics I Thermodynamics from a physicists perspective. Thermo and I are old friends. We met back in sophomore year and have been inseparable since. This will be the third class that explicitly concerns thermodynamics, and the nth class Ive taken that includes some sort of thermo. Im enjoying it, if only for the eerie familiarity. 8.593: Biological Physics My favorite class this term, and my first graduate-level course. Finally, biology the way Ive been waiting to see it! I once read an article that said Biologists think that if they try really hard, they can solve any problem with arithmetic. Ive found that to be true in the course 7 classes Ive taken here. Not to denigrate the biologists I know in any way. Its just that the courses shy away from heavy duty mathematics. I say if youve got it, flaunt it. This course gives a rigorous description of selective but representative biological phenomena (vision, protein-protein interactions, etc) using the machinery of calculus and statistical mechanics. The problem sets are longer and harder than any Ive seen before, but theyre also fewer and certainly worth the effort. 10.491: Integrated Chemical Engineering II Continuous process design. Right now were working on a computer simulation of the production of biodiesel from used vegetable oil. I regret that I dont enjoy this sort of thing as much as I do physics. But its the last ChemE class I need for my degree, and Im doing a lot better this term. Im too close to stop. 21M.051: Fundamentals of Music A long, long time ago, in another life called high-school, I was a musician. I wasnt great. In fact, I was pretty average. Once I came to MIT, I gave it up. But after going for 4 years without music, and being a senior whod finished his hass concentration, I decided it was time to go back. Fundamentals of music centers around learning music using the voice as your primary instrument. So we sing all the songs that you learned in elementary school (including Hot Cross Buns and that song about the Kookaburra). We also learn how to play the piano. I cant say I like it more than any of my physics classes, but it is certainly a refreshing interlude. What else is new? 87 days until I graduate. I have a job. But more on those things later.